|
|||
|
|||
| Home > Advocacy > From the VP for Advocacy | |||
From the VP for Advocacy...September 4, 2008 Dear PTA Leaders and Advocates for Children, Hello and welcome back to school! Here is what is going on in advocacy right now: The state budget is not yet decided. Billions of dollars in support for schools and children’s programs hang in the balance as legislative leaders try to hammer out a deal. (For information on the delay, the various proposals, and the budget process, see the attached document.) California State PTA and its fellow members of the Education Coalition support the following budget principles:
Of the current proposals, the Joint Conference Committee budget plan most closely fits PTA priorities. Your participation and action in the next few days can make a real difference to California children. Let your legislators know your priorities. Express support of the Conference Committee plan. Please take time to contact your elected representatives ASAP. Phone calls and faxes are most immediate. Emails through your representative’s website are also helpful. Identify yourself as a constituent if you are one. (To find your assemblymember and senator and their contact information, click here.) Spread the word through PTA channels. Time is of the essence. Yours truly, Celia Jaffe, VP Advocacy California State Budget Stalemate
The Delay The Budget Proposals Here are a few salient points from each proposal: Governor:
Higher Revenues:
1¢ sales tax increase for three years and/or borrowing on anticipated increases in income from the lottery;
Borrowing:
$15 billion in bond sales to be repaid from lottery increases and/or sales tax; borrowed money to be used for current year deficit and to build up a rainy day fund
Cuts to Education:
$3.9 billion less than the workload budget (last year’s funding plus COLA); funds zero of 5.66% statutory COLA; funds zero COLA on categoricals like Class Size Reduction and instructional materials.
Other Budget Cuts:
Child welfare services cut 11.4%; foster care cut 10%; eliminates CalWorks “Safety Net” and cash only payments for children
Future funding caps/budget cutting authority: Gives Governor unilateral authority to cut state funding during a budget crisis; spending cap Conference Committee: (Failed to pass 2/3 vote strictly along party lines)
Higher Revenues:
Reinstates tax brackets for higher income taxpayers—10% for joint filing over $321,000 income and 11% for joint filings over $642,000; suspends laws about net operating loss deductions; reduces dependent tax credit for high income households.
Borrowing:
None
Cuts to Education:
$2.2 billion more for Prop 98 than Governor’s May Revise; still comes short of workload budget for education; funds 2.12% of the statutory 5.66% COLA on both revenue limits and categoricals
Other Budget Cuts:
No major reductions in other state programs affecting children.
Future funding caps/budget cutting authority: None Republican Proposal: (Some highlights released, but entire plan not written up for consideration as of Sept 4.)
Higher Revenues:
None
Borrowing:
$2 billion, backed by lottery income
Cuts to Education:
Deeper than either Governor or Conference Committee
Other Budget Cuts:
Substantial; deeper cuts in social services to lessen cuts in education
Future funding caps/budget cutting authority: Hard spending cap based on current year; unilateral midyear budget cutting power by governor
To achieve success, any compromise proposal will need the support of the majority Democrats and approximately 15 Republican legislators. Stay tuned in. For more information, go to Thank you for reading through this and trying to understand a very complex issue. Your contacts with your legislators and their staff members don’t need to delve into specifics of the various plans. Just a reiteration of the main principles for a good budget is enough. Go get ‘em! Together we make a difference. |
|||